We should give ourselves some credit. Every single one of us is incredibly unique.
We should give ourselves some credit. Every single one of us is incredibly unique.
The other day I read a really great article (long after it's 2012 publication date) that talked about a phrase companies like Google and IDEO employ to get brains thinking creatively and collaboratively. How?
As in, we need a new solution and we are open to it.
might ...
We are open to big ideas, off the wall ideas. We're removing the 'dumb idea' option from the table. Let's think big.
we...
Together. We're building this together, inherently.
To this point, how might we foster spaces, dialogues, and communities that truly embrace the 'how might we' prompt?
... By asking it of ourselves every time something doesn't work.
The dark side of individuality is the practice of acting as though our emotions are the only, or most relevant reality. If how we feel trumps everything else, we risk habitually convincing ourselves of a hugely selfish way of interacting with the world. Our emotions are symptoms. They're not "how things are." And really, how could they be? Any one person's emotions are the product of one intersection point with reality. It's hardly consensus.
That said, what should our emotional symptoms tell us? What process should ensue as the result of noticing our emotions and unpacking their origins?
Perhaps the way we feel really isn't that important.
Perhaps it has more to do with how our feelings affect the way we live. After all, two conclusions can certainly lead to two totally different actions.
If productive mental states open the door for productive realities, we could be well served by parsing emotional symptoms from the realities we ascribe to them.
We're often looking to prove a hypothesis, or more aptly, a deeply held belief, as opposed to just letting the data tell us what's going on. That's because we're all biased in one way or another, and that's not a bad thing, but it should color how we think about expanding our worldview.
What's more, there's no political leaning when it comes to people undercutting answers before they ever hear them. That happens on the left as much as the right.
We can find proof for anything, but is that really the point?
Only if planting your feet in wet concrete sounds promising.
"This just in..." is a phrase we hear every day. It both relates to the insanity of our 24 hour news cycle, and the rapidly increasing pace at which the universe expands and reveals itself. As we think we have the full picture, there's more to consider.
In that light, conclusions are really just springboards for more springboards.
And that's precisely the suspicion held by those of us who'd rather not ask the next question. We're timid in the face of uncertainty. We fear the possibility of receiving more than we bargained for.
But if we understand that we'll never have the whole picture, we automatically make our work more focused and our lives more practical. We can look at everything as a test in which we're open to the results, as opposed to hellbent on proving something.
Being willing to ask a question entails being prepared for the answer, but if springboards lead to more springboards, we risk a lot less.
And we stay on our feet.
Let's be suspicious of our own conclusions. The future has a funny way of providing relevant data.
We're all armed with stories... but maybe our stories should really disarm us... We possess tales of caution, irreverence, disappointment, and victory. It's that breadth that can make gaps hard to bridge.
Being honest with ourselves about our stories and the perceptions we bring to certain ideas, places, and types, can help decipher why we each play the role we tend to play.
If we're armed with stories, the connotation is one of battle.
But our stories should do the opposite for us. They should give us a better understanding of our place in the world, not a default reaction to provide.
Our stories don't yield the universal truths we so often like to ascribe to them, but they do tell us something about ourselves.
I recently spent 12 days in Costa Rica for my little sister's wedding. I officiated the proceedings, it was beautiful, and so so happy. After the wedding weekend, we made our way to another location for more chillin'. I met a gentleman in one of the restaurants, who was wearing a Liverpool FC jersey (next season's away kit) and I immediately told him how great it looked as he walked up.
We chatted about my seeing a Liverpool game in the mid-90's that made me a fan forever. Robbie Fowler, 2 goals (a brace), on a rainy Saturday night at Highbury, the home of Arsenal FC.
We buddied up, and a few days later, this gentleman, Matt, walked up to me with a red flag rolled up in his hand.
He told me that the flag had been waved proudly in The Kop, the supporters end of Anfield, Liverpool's famed stadium. I got goosebumps.
He gave me the flag, and I felt as though I had been knighted. We've since stayed in touch, chat on Whats App, and I've been invited to join him at Anfield one day.
You may not be into soccer, and you may not care that Liverpool is gearing up for an important season, but the point to be made, is that a simple greeting can open the door to some really cool experiences.
One mere commonality can not only create connection, but it also validates the idea that looking for the overlap goes a long way.
What if our first thought was about the space where the Venn diagram converges, not the portions where it doesn't? What if we paired that with a smile?
If we're open to it, the lyrics are true... You'll Never Walk Alone.
When things are socialized, we do them together. What's so wrong with that?
I wrote this article so that artists can refer to a playbook when looking to get more eyes on their work, garner more shows, and sell more art. The funny thing is, the word "artist" can be substituted for the words "business owner" or "entrepreneur", as well as a list of other titles that essentially mean, you make ideas real.
Being strategic means giving our art a fighting chance.
Art = ideas in practice.
It's been a while since I've written here consistently... I hope your volumes aren't entirely turned down! I'm hoping to get back to it more regularly, and I'd love to discuss questions or ideas you have about communication, business, strategy, intentional living, or anything else, really.
Reply to this email with your angle, question, idea, or takeaway, and I'll make it a topic for this blog.
Maybe it's something you struggle with, need clarity on, or are looking to build strategically. Or maybe it's a story of learning that you think could be applied broadly.
Whatever it is, it'd be fun to try your hat on for size in a way that might help other people on this list.
Thanks for opening this email and for coming with me on this continued journey of thought experimentation, value creation, and mission alignment.
If the answer is NO before we actually know that to be true, we're the bureaucracy. If dragging our feet makes us feel powerful, we're the bureaucracy.
When creating roadblocks "because we've always done it that way", we're the bureaucracy.
When we pass along ideas we haven't tested, we're the bureaucracy.
If we only spring into motion when it benefits us directly, we're the bureaucracy.
When we assume better can't be done, we're the bureaucracy.
The greatest antidote to red tape is selflessly disarming impediments to progress that we construct ourselves. Hell, we can't rag on the bureaucracy if we're helping it subsist.
Don't be the bureaucracy.
Heads = WHY. Tails = HOW.
There's huge upside to letting our guard down. My friend John once told me that he's never had someone share as much of their inner, emotional experience as I have with him. That's either a compliment or a plea for me to shut up, lol.
But having relationships in which we can share that interiority is vital. I'm not suggesting we tattoo any insecurity on our forehead, but I am saying that we should treat these special relationships as the gold that they are.
Real connection comes from sharing more than merely the highlights. If we let our closest friends see our incomplete selves, we share hope for betterment while providing insight into another human being who's (also) just trying to figure things out.
Lets share the stuff that shows we're unsure.
It'll help us all realize that we're not the only ones wondering what the hell is going on.
Every 6 months, I tend to mentally hit the refresh button. Whether it's a turning point in business, a new project, an interesting prospect, or a personal evolution, I'm realizing that two things always float to the surface as I question what the hell I'm doing or what's next...
Regardless of who we are or where we're going, getting better at what we do and staying open to growth areas seems like a solid way to put one foot in front of the other... especially when we don't know what's coming next.
They are never the same. Once we start thinking they are, it's time to check ourselves.
Waiting to make a change means incurring greater costs down the line. Larger organizations process decisions so much that they end up lowering productivity dramatically by creating a bureaucracy that is unable to move swiftly. If a project costs 10k to implement but we spend 4x as much effort as we should evaluating, jockeying, positioning, and deliberating, we just upped the cost of the project by the following equation: cost of labor multiplied by time spent deliberating.
Whether the project is renting a vending machine or launching a volunteering initiative, we're better off basing our evaluations of success on data, not notions of control.
If we're honest with ourselves, we know when those respective entities are steering the ship.
When we deliberate too much, we rob ourselves of an opportunity to let data determine efficacy.
If we make decisions quicker, speed up iteration cycles, and reduce the cost of launching, over time, we'll have spent much more of our days working on the aspects of creation and collaboration that move the needle forward, instead of gumming up the gears.
Deliberate too long and data takes a back seat. As a feeling man, this is something I'm learning myself.
'When we have poor values - that is, poor standards we set for ourselves and others - we are essentially giving fucks about the things that don't matter, things that in fact make our life worse. But when we choose better values, we are able to divert our fucks to something better - toward things that matter, things that improve the state of our well-being and that generate happiness, pleasure, and success as side effects.' - Mark Manson, The Subtle Art of Not Giving A Fuck
We don't have to be experts in everything, but we do need to know enough about everything to avoid getting taken. A CEO must know how everything works so she can pull in the reigns on her VP of Digital when he's building something that's way too expensive, unnecessary, or hard to pivot from.
A homeowner must know how the furnace works, where the fusebox is, and how much it costs to fix the roof.
Being conversant in many things because we've done the research that enables meaningful participation, prevents us from paying top dollar, whether in time or cash, for someone to solve our blind spot.
Blind spots are dangerous. The bottom line is, 'don't know' = huge costs.
It's interesting how at certain points in life, the worst thing we can be is "pop." As in, pop music. As in, mainstream.
Pop music also has perfect tone and pitch, reaches people from all walks of life, and provides a platform for the next thing we make. So you know, it's not all bad.
The connotation of pop includes a flattening of skill or talent, a simple something for the masses. But as long as we feel good making, enjoy the people we work with, and have an ethos that feels right for us, we might as well invite everyone to hear our song.